Stephen Colbert will return to doing episodes of “The Colbert Report” from his usual New York studio on Monday night, riding high from the resounding success of his week of shows in Iraq. Traditional media like the New York Times and LA Times praised the way he walked the line between being funny and challenging his guests (as well as some military policies, including a ballsy segment about Don’t Ask Don’t Tell) while remaining respectful to the troops and deferential to their service.
However, while the troops in the audience seemed genuinely entertained, I was curious what the rest of the military thought of Colbert’s visit. And, by and large, they didn’t. I checked out about a dozen different military blogs, and only the well-regarded Blackfive mentioned Colbert this week, calling him a “true American patriot” (the comments from there varied from those who watched and thought he was funny to those who didn’t watch him and tut-tutted their preconceived notions).
However, the words that I agreed with most — and it pains me to say this — came from my least favorite online magazine, Slate:
He reminded his core audience of jaded college-boy liberals that the soldiers they scoff at as automatons are their peers. Nothing unites a group like laughter. In his clowning, Colbert performed an act of patriotism far beyond politicians’ rote statements about honoring the troops.
As a college-boy liberal/automaton soldier myself, that particular disconnect in American society has always pissed me off. A college degree and an urban lifestyle doesn’t make someone any more right in their beliefs than someone with less education and a lower salary. At the same time, many servicemen’s willful anti-intellectualism mars the nation’s impression of their hard work and the sacrifices they make. There’s only one America, and it would do well to adopt Colbert’s best traits: the courage to question the status quo, and the ability to laugh at oneself.


well that was surprisingly deep of you, well done
A college-boy liberal that hates Slate?! But where else can you find “Doonesbury” comic strips?
@BuddyRepperton: I was wondering the same thing.
I’ll cast my lot with smellme. Well said.
Ditto what the other commenters said.
By the way, Uff, if we don’t tell you enough through all the snark and dead hooker jokes, a sincere thanks for protecting us and our freedoms.
You tough, magnificent SOB!
Yep good job. But it’s a sad day when you have to congratulate an entertainer, for not being a complete jag off to the very people that protect his freedom to be a smarmy asshole toward them the other 364 days a year.
This post would be greatly improved with titties. Just sayin’.
Well said, sir. I haven’t liked Colbert as a person since he shit all over the “Venture Bros.” and left them hanging (is that petty of me?) and my jaded, intellectual side knows deep in his heart he truly did this for ratings and an increased presence throughout the rest of the “serious” media. That being said, going into a combat zone still takes some sack. And the men and women who are there every day deserve this recognition and entertainment (and far more, but that’s another rant). So, all in all, kudos to Mr. Colbert.
@battleflag If it helps any, when I met Colbert about a year ago, he signed a card for me upon request as Phil Ken Sebben. “Ha Ha!” and everything.
“Blackfive” sounds like an awesome “urban” boy band.
Uff, you don’t have to feel bad about liking a Slate article. You can always use the Blind Squirrel/Nut exception.
Great post. As a habitual lurker here, remined me of another post of yours and a question I had: If I don’t personally know anyone over in Iraq, how do I choose who to send the listerine bottle full of booze and the stack of porn?
[back to lurking, but please answer]
how do I choose who to send the listerine bottle full of booze and the stack of porn?
I’ve actually been in touch with my old C.O. to see which of our old Marines is overseas right now. Will let you know when I get that info.
Feel free to PM (guessing you have access to me email)
“many servicemen’s willful anti-intellectualism”
I’m always kind of baffled at this notion that servicemen are willfully anti-intellectual. Maybe I’m just jaded by my brother — who graduated from the Naval Academy with a degree in aeronautical engineering and who’s now attending medical school — or my law school roommate — a Rhodes scholar who read philosophy books in his spare time and entered the Air Force JAG corps — or my articles editor on the law review — a Marine who ran triathalons when he wasn’t graduating in the top 5% of his class — or … well, you get the idea. (I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention a certain blogger who fits more into the mold of military personnel to which I’m accustomed.)
Did you know that the military has a higher proportion of college graduates than the population at large? Or that members of the military were raised in households with higher income than the national average?
Admittedly, I grew up in a military household, and I’ve been fortunate enough to know several members of the military, so maybe my perception is skewed. But the mere fact that military personnel don’t hang out in coffee houses discussing Nietzsche ironically doesn’t mean they’re anti-intellectual. It just means they’re not douchebags.
And thanks for your service.
Oh, and when I referred to military service members being college educated, I was of course referring to the College of Andy:
[www.universityofandy.com]
“Tease it like a midget.”
I think most people are well aware that servicemen are their peers, but it doesn’t stop them disagreeing with what the military does in Iraq, the torture of innocent civilians, and so on. All sorts of assholes are our peers, both inside and outside the military.
Oh, and Buddy, it’s not like the military defend anyone’s right to do anything – when was the last invasion the US had to put up with? The world has become less safe since we started bombing Iraq, lest we forget. I don’t see why the military demand automatic respect – why not do a week of shows for firefighters? Or inner city social workers?
“I’m always kind of baffled at this notion that servicemen are willfully anti-intellectual. Maybe I’m just jaded by my brother — who graduated from the Naval Academy with a degree in aeronautical engineering and who’s now attending medical school — or my law school roommate — a Rhodes scholar who read philosophy books in his spare time and entered the Air Force JAG corps — or my articles editor on the law review — a Marine who ran triathalons when he wasn’t graduating in the top 5% of his class — or … well, you get the idea. (I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention a certain blogger who fits more into the mold of military personnel to which I’m accustomed.)”
It’s totally weird and surprising that the military guys you encounter in law school are smart and intellectual. I was told they were all jarheads, but your large sample size, especially relative to the actual size of the entire uniformed services, has convinced me otherwise. Please tell me about more smart people that you know, super-law review editor guy…