
There’s nothing wrong with ABC’s Wednesday night sitcom, “Modern Family.” It’s one of the most watchable sitcoms on television; it’s genial, amiable, and warm-hearted. It occasionally elicits a smile but rarely contains moments of cleverness. It is as easygoing as any show on television; where other sitcoms often try too hard to be clever, “Modern Family” comes about itself effortlessly.
But that’s also it’s biggest drawback: There seems to be little to no effort put into the show’s writing and creative process. It relies almost singularly on the pleasant chemistry between the cast. The characters are staid; the situations are recycled; and the comedy is good-natured but bland.
Two and a half years ago, “Modern Family” debuted during the same month that NBC’s “Community” began airing, and at the time, it seemed liked the braver, more daring sitcom: It introduced a gay couple that didn’t fit within the Jack McFarland gay mold: They weren’t flaming caricatures. They were real characters with an honest, authentic relationship. They were surrounded by a wealthy grumpy man with a gorgeous, but shrieky trophy wife and her son, a precocious overweight Lothario. Phil Dunphy was the Dad version of Steve Carell in “The Office,” his wife was the controlling, OCD stay-at-home Mom, and they had three sitcom tropes for children: The pretty dim one; the smart one with glasses; and the doofus.
The problem with “Modern Family,” however, is that in two-and-a-half years, nothing has changed. The character traits introduced in the pilot have not budged. Phil still does goofy things that his son emulates; he still craves the approval of his father-in-law, Jay, who both learns a lesson and teaches one to his step-son, Manny, each week, while Gloria walks around in low-cut blouses and shrieks cliches that are equal parts amusing and obnoxious. Claire and Mitchell try to maintain control over a situation, while Phil and Cameron attempt to broaden their horizons, but after two and a half years and around 60 episodes, their horizons are no more broadened than when the show began.
Nothing happens. Nothing advances. Nobody grows. The relationship dynamics are static. The episodes are disconnected. And with an ensemble so large and only 22 minutes to play with, each character only gets three to five minutes of screen time each week, which is barely enough time to get to know anyone or develop a character, and so the characters necessarily have to rely on the same personality types, which are beaten into bloody pulps of pleasantness.
“Modern Family” is supposed to be about a 21st century family, but it’s only that in name: They don’t actually deal with “modern” or even serious problems. In fact, it’s a very conservative show: Petty, inoffensive jealousy is the biggest issue the show has ever tackled. Nobody ever even asks Claire why her arms are so freakishly skinny. That’s probably why it’s one of the highest rated shows on TV: It’s simple, familiar, and pleasant. Nothing more. And while there’s certainly something to be said for that, it’s also disappointing in a way. “Modern Family” may wind up running for a decade, but it will never be brave. It may occasionally make us laugh, but it will never challenge us. Yet it’s not exactly the show’s fault: As long as we never expect any thing more from “Modern Family,” it will never bother to give it to us. It’s the new “The Office”: We watch it not because we love it, but because it’s there.

Yeah modern family is pretty much paint by numbers and when its that boring you start to see the flaws. like that wiener kid (the white one) is probably the worst child actor ever.
“We watch it not because we love it, but because it’s there.”
Also Tits.
can we get the old dude back writing?
Dear Modern Family:
Please quit covering up Sofia Vergara while flaunting the high school aged characters on the show in bikinis. It makes me think of Chris Hansen and I don’t like thinking of Chris Hansen.
It’s amazing, I watched season 1, loved it, and 2 eps into Season 2 this exact post hit me. Nothing new is coming. I have friends that froth at the mouth over every new episode. If its on, I enjoy, I laugh, and don’t have an unpleasant thing to say, but it’s definitely not “must watch” tv.
I’ve been feeling this way about the show for awhile now. It seems like as soon as they started winning awards and getting recognition, they stopped trying. Its just like “Friends” where it started out kinda good, but then everybody just turned into a one-note parody of their character.
And yes, I realize that I. Just admitted that I watched “Friends”. I regret nothing.
Also, tits.
David Gerrold (who wrote the Star Trek episode “The Trouble With Tribbles” ) wrote that one thing you need to avoid when writing regularly for a TV show is letting your format become formula. All the basic character elements Dustin mentions are the format, but when they behave the same way every week in the same situations, then you’ve let the format of the show become the formula for each episode. I’m OK with this to a point, but at the moment it makes “Modern Family” less of a must-watch show.
I know you guys love Happy Endings, but I have seen a handful of episodes and I feel the same way. The whole “we accidentally gave away our money to somebody and now we feel bad about taking it back” storyline from last night? Referencing your previous post, that’s a TV trope I could never see again. And the guy in the Santa suit congratulating himself for stopping a mugging while another crime is happening right behind him? It’s dramatic irony used for comedic effect! No…it’s lazy, lazy writing.
You’re looking for character arc in a formulaic sitcom? I watch Modern Family for laughs and boobs. Am I disappointed that the characters haven’t developed? No, because there are other shows that have more complex plots and deeper characters, however, none of them are Sophia Vergara.
Substitute Happy Endings for Modern Family and this article makes just as much sense. In fact, substitute just about any sit-com you can imagine into this.
I’ll sum up the entire article: the characters do what they do.
Take Seinfeld. Is Kramer acting all crazy and hatching up new schemes again? Yes! Is Jerry nitpicking his current relationship and magnifying tiny faults to epic proportions? You betcha!
Name a f’n sitcom in which the character undergoes dramatic change over a long period of time. I’m sure there has to be some, I just can’t think of them. And that’s kind of the point.
I watch Fawlty Towers because I want to see Basil Fawlty be narcissistic, rude, and self-interested. That’s where the comedy comes from.
I don’t watch shit because it’s there.
So what does the internet give it’s stamp of approval to these days in the area of “Sitcom”? Parks and Rec? Community? New Girl?
I just want to fit in.
At the same time, plenty of people bitch at “Community” because of how they’ve tried to change the characters over time (by bitch, I mean they don’t like certain episodes). Look at “21st Century Mixology”-one of the most divisive episodes of Community- which is a slow, character based sitcom episode that establishes Troy’s growth as a man (while moving other character arcs-like Annie’s). And nearly half the people who watched hated it. It’s hard to change characters AND write jokes week after week, and I’m sure that’s why most sitcoms stay stagnant. You set the viewer up for laugh expectations, and mine those jokes. It’s harder to change characters in sitcoms; the viewer is expecting a certain stock every week, and character changes disrupt the comedic flow, somewhat.
But kudos to Community for trying. Just one of the many reasons I love that show.
Honestly, I just like having a show that’s sort of a common denominator between me and my less discerning friends and family. It’s not NBC Thursdays, but I do like forward it every week.
Also, Phil and Luke Dunphy are hilarious and I will fight anyone who says otherwise.
If they took Dustin’s advice, he’d be writing a column about how much better he liked the way they were in Season 1 and how they screwed up the show by having the characters take chances.
Look forward. Son of a bee sting.
If you feel this post is too kind to Modern Family, as I do, feel free to read this – [www.mrdestructo.com]
Nice article Rowles. I agree. But Gloria has gone from a glorious pair of breasts to a nails on the chalkboard infuriatingly annoying stereotype. That I think about punching her repeatedly in the face before motorboating her tits these days speaks wonders as to how lazy and insulting her character has become. Also Manny is a little cunt too.
Phil is still great tho.
@Junker
That’s more of a condemnation of the entire Emmy selection process.
Both Modern Family and Happy Endings were blah last night. Phil’s reaction to the stun gun almost made me change the channel.
I think we may be hard on Modern Family because the critics love it so much, heck everyone I know loves it. That’s because it’s so good. Consistently. It may not be the most original, and it recycles the same stories every sitcom does, but the “3 different families” dynamic is still new.
The characters may not have developed much, but I love the characters. Cam, Phil, Jay, Luke, Claire, Gloria and Manny are all gold, and that’s why I watch, not because it’s there.
When Phil gave Jay the dog antlers and Jay yells for Gloria to get his camera? Oh man, classic. Maybe I didn’t laugh out loud, but that was certainly a great moment. Modern Family creates these “moments” every week and that’s why I keep tuning in.
And Happy Endings is exactly the same too. It’s like Gilmore Girls in it’s pop culture references and rapid dialogue, Both shows have 1 standout character (Phil Dunphy and Damon Wayans Jr). Neither show will set the world on fire, but be serviceable in their ability to watch TV and have a few chuckles for an hour
I dunno, in my opinion you’re overthinking this one. One of my favorite shows ever was Cheers, and any growth those characters experienced was forgotten by the time Norm walked into the bar the following week.
@essequemodeia
True, I guess I should’ve just excerpted part of that. Still, I like me some “Modern Family” hatin’.
@Squabbler: if you mean Sarah Hyland (the girl who plays the pretty/dumb daughter), don’t fear: she’s 21, so Chris Hansen won’t come out from behind the wall.
But yeah, I’d rather see Sofia Vergara’s boobs too.
Last night’s episode hit a new low. “Target? This place is HUGE!” Fuck you and your product endorsement. When the not one, but two Target commercials came on during the commercial break following that scene, my husband goes “Weren’t just watching a Target commercial?”
(For the record, Breaking Bad is the only show that gets away with product endorsement with me. “Denny’s: For all your post-corpse cleanup needs.”)
Don’t forget attorneys at law. DUI? Dealing Drugs? Better Call Saul!
[www.bettercallsaul.com]
yeah last night’s modern family was fucking painful to watch. the target commercial, the cartoon reaction to a stun gun, and the heartfelt speech at the end. it was gross.
It’s still a hilarious show, so I don’t see that it needs to be picked on yet.
I’m glad I’m not the only one that has become bored of watching Modern Family.
I don’t really look for character development from shows that don’t take themselves too seriously. Shows like Always Sunny, Seinfeld, and to a lesser extent Community and Happy Endings have great characters and great writing, so I don’t mind seeing them in the same situations every week. Community and Happy Endings can still pull off the sweet moment, or show the growth of a character, but they operate with a longer rope for me on the suspension of disbelief because they dont’ create a universe that expects me to be invested in any of that.
My problem is the mockumentary style sitcoms is that I feel like they’re asking us to be invested in the dramatic lives of the characters and their relationships. I think if you’re going to ask that of your audience than you need to deliver on the type of development that I think Dustin is referring. I hate to reference the original version of the Office but look at what they did with the main characters over just two seasons The longer they keep up that documentatry style, the more aggrevating it gets when nothing seems to change.
MF will always have its moments for me, usually it one-off lines of dialogue like Cam’s response to Claire about visiting the oakridge boys. Even if you ignore the same old one-note cliche’s in the same set of wacky misunderstandings, you still have Manny, Claire, Mitchell, Gloria, and both daughters being annoying and unfunny. I hope next season they end up trapped in a well and the show centers on Phil, Luke, Jay, and a toned down Cam just trying to move on with their lives.
I was going to say all that stuff that other people said about Happy Endings. I almost let out an audible groan when they made it so blatant that Jane was putting the tip money in the same color envelope as the vacay-cay money.
“Nothing happens. Nothing advances. Nobody grows. The relationship dynamics are static. The episodes are disconnected.”
Um, isn’t that pretty much the definition of sitcom? Sure, there are exceptions to the rule (cough * Community * cough), but if you don’t want a steak, don’t go to Sizzler. That being said, I guess if I didn’t want “devil’s advocate” articles I wouldn’t read this site, so: my petard = hoisting me.
The only development I’ve been rooting for on Modern Family is Haley’s boobs.
Disappointed she is actually 21.
Wasn’t one of the “annoying troupes” in the post the other day about you hate it when a character changes? “sometimes we just want the jerk to be a jerk”.
I’m confused…..
Ty Burrell and Sarah Hyland are the only two reasons I´m still watching this show every week.
i have zero or less expectations from tv but modern family had the best joke i’ve ever seen on network television when manny was selling christmas paper door to door. he knocked on a jewish lady’s door and made the pitch, she said she was jewish, he waited the perfect amount of time and said, “I bet you appreciate a good value”
Happy endings had the second best joke i’ve personally heard in a long time last night when on of the broads handed max (that’s my name, too!) an envelope and he said, “Are these the glen gerry leads”. It was unexpected and that’s what i want, is what Alcoholics Gratuitus said. Tits and maybe a laugh. Don’t make me think. That’s what my fucking job is for.
Seeing as how Modern Family wrote an ENTIRE EPISODE around the Apple store and a fucking ipad last year, you shouldn’t be surprised about the whole Target thing.
Sorry, were you saying something?
/stares at gif
@poonTASTIC
I think the trope is when the character changes and then everyone in the surround cast says “we want our jerk back!” and he changes back.
@Max
That Glengarry joke was fucking hilarious. Especially when it was followed up with “no, those leads are for closers
endquote
I don’t mind Modern Family. It’s not brilliant comedic TV, but if that’s your standard there’s not a whole hell of a lot to watch. The characters are static, but a lot of the jokes are just subtle enough to keep me engaged. It is what it is: interesting, but not groundbreaking.
Also, I’m Switzerland in the Sophia Vergara, Sarah Hyland discussion – I stand firmly behind my policy as an equal opportunity titty starin’ creep.
@Tace Jones
Agreement
I’m glad to see the love for MF waning on this site!
I like that this hits on the issues with each character but it seems to forget Phil is a sitcom trope too – the idiotic patriarch of the household. Apparently he’ll never graduate from being a less funny Michael Scott. Say what you will about Steve Carrell and his character but I’ve noticed multiple jokes in MF that came straight from Michael Scott’s mouth. One example, they both use the same trick to remember people’s names – except Michael Scott would say “You’re fat, you like pizza, pepperoni, pepperoni TONY!” to his face, just one in a battery of insults to name everyone in the room, where Phil is less insulting and whispers it off the phone. Love or hate him, Michael Scott > Phil Dunphy.
Modern Family, like How I Met Your Mother, is a predictable sitcom. What sets it apart from Two and Half Men and most of the other crap on TV is that they do all that predictable sitcom stuff really well. That’s why they’re so popular, and why they have a broader audience than my other favorite shows (Community, Parks and Rec, Always Sunny, etc.)
Could not disagree more about characters not changing on Cheers. Only two characters remained largely static–Norm and Cliff. Everyone else had character development that puts most sitcoms (including modern family) to shame. They managed to retain what was memorable and funny about each character–Carla’s meanness, Sam’s womanizing–but still allow them to develop over time. It’s actually quite amazing to watch if you start with Season 1 and follow through to the end. The only thing that remains the same is the bar (even if the original was burned and rebuilt on the show) and Norm and Cliff.
Oh jeez. I either forget the Apple store episode or didn’t see it. Lame.
And I agree about the ridiculousness of the whole “switched envelopes” plot in Happy Endings. One hundred $20 bills feels thicker than ten $20 bills, brain trust of Happy Endings writers.
*sigh* I love it when internet snark rears it’s ugly head before it’s even deserved. You want the show to be something it’s not, and never really aimed to be. It’s still smart, it’s still funny, it was NEVER edgy.
First of all: if you want character development, don’t watch an ensemble comedy cast. Even the Office (which you give a backhanded compliment to here – though it’s total body of work is light years ahead of Modern Family) has had limited development for almost all characters. This isn’t Arrested Development, and there’s a reason it won’t be.
Since Matt has left, this blog has criticized Sons of Anarchy, Modern Family, and praised the Office. What’s with the 180 turnaround? Those all fly completely in the face of things this blog was known for beforehand. What’s next, you’re going to start telling us puppies aren’t cute? Are you going to try and introduce Dachsund Friday? I’m tired of this blasphemy.
(To be fair, we only criticized the “SoA” FINALE (not the entire series, which was placed on the 15 Best Series on Netflix), and this review is not a pan of “Modern Family,” it’s just an expression of lack of enthusiasm for it (as I said, it’s watchable, genial, and heartwarming, and it’s consistently so, which is more than I can say for the current incarnation of “The Office.”) Also, “Arrested Development” WAS an ensemble comedy with just as many characters as “Modern Family” and it managed to pull it off on a weekly basis. Finally, we were thinking LOLCats Friday, but only for you, Sarpedon. Only for you. — DR)
Your thoughts, which are correct, are the reason I stopped watching the show after the 3rd season premiere. I hate shows that don’t change. I especially hate shows that have the ability to change but don’t.
“Modern Family” comes about itself effortlessly.
Don’t we all?
*wipes down desk, walls, cat*
For a movie about 12 people saw in its original run, Glengarry Glen Ross gets sitcom-bombed a lot. I think even Roseanne had a Glengarry reference back in the day.
We want our jerk back episode = Jay’s brother has cancer episode.
I gotta say I get more laughs from Modern Family than Happy Endings. A lot of that probably has to do with Wayans Jr. being the most annoying actor/character ever on a decent show. Fuck him. “Donkey Kick”
People are treating Modern Family here like every other internet dichotomy where a tv show has to either be a) THE GREATEST AND EDGIEST SHOW AROUND THAT YOU JUST WOULDNT UNDERSTAND!!! or b) TOTAL SHIT FOR DUMB FUCKS AND FUCK YOU FOR LIKING IT.
Modern Family is good, not great nor shitty. I DVR it every week but don’t watch it if I don’t have time. I don’t get upset that it doesn’t try to be more like other better shows like Parks and Rec because that’s not what its trying to do. Take a chill pill people.
Of course I say all of this when I get more mad about Community than any other show because I’ve seen how great it can be but am often frustrated at how they change the characters way too much and put too much emphasis on trying to be as “smart” as possible, at the expense of being funny.
In other news, Sarah Hyland was the MVP last night. ABC must get a huge fine for unleashing Sofia Vergara’s glorious body in full form or something, because it made no sense why she was covered up during that pool scene but hot underage vixen wasn’t.
Modern Family sucks and its fans are giant fuck-ups
@Mixhail
Are you saying that Modern Family not trying to be better is a good thing?
I like Modern Family, and will pretty much continue watching it as long as it’s still entertaining, but I agree with this article. But is it just me, or is 30 Rock doing the same thing? I mean, look at all the characters in 30 Rock. All they do is just becoming more and more cartoony each season.
I’m going to say that Modern Family is succeeding because of the reasons you list as a bad thing. Maybe the viewing public just simply wants to be entertained. There are times you don’t want to have to think through everything that’s going on to enjoy it. It’s a tried and true formula, the cast does a great job delivering their product in a way that still feels authentic without coming off as cheesy.
I’m not a fan of The Office and similar sitcoms because they try to be too smart for what they are. Comedy shouldn’t require a lot of thought to enjoy. Arrested Development suffered the same fate, trying to be more than it should have been for the sake of being “brilliant”.
At least season 3 is better than season 2. While it is not on season 1 level of funny, I still laugh pretty hard 2-3 times an episode, which is a lot more than most comedy movies these days. They get a pass.
Personally, I’d quit bitching about this show because it has a shelf-life of about 5-6 seasons. And then it will be replaced by another show like Whitney.